Best EasyGen Alternatives for LinkedIn in 2026
The best EasyGen alternatives solve different problems. Supergrow is the closest match if you want AI-assisted LinkedIn writing with a calendar. Postomator fits a team coordinating several people's profiles. Buffer is simpler if scheduling matters more than LinkedIn-specific writing help.
EasyGen might still be the right tool for you. Its site describes post generation, creator research, trend discovery, and a content calendar. It advertises three free posts, then $59.99 per month. If its drafts regularly help you publish posts you're proud to sign, switching could add work instead of removing it. Check EasyGen's product and pricing page for the current offer.
It's easier to decide once you name your bottleneck: finding ideas, turning your expertise into a good draft, getting a post approved, scheduling it, or learning from how it did. This guide compares seven tools against those jobs, using public vendor information checked on September 25, 2026. Prices change.
We make Postomator, so we're biased. We listed it first, but we'll tell you when another tool is the better pick.
Key takeaways
- Choose Postomator when one person coordinates LinkedIn posts for a founder or several employees. Its site lists a $39 monthly team workspace.
- Choose Supergrow when LinkedIn writing and repurposing are the core job. Its monthly Starter and Pro plans are $19 and $39.
- Choose Buffer when you mainly need a reliable queue across networks. Its free plan allows three channels and ten scheduled posts per channel.
- Keep EasyGen if its trend research and drafts are already the part of your process that works.
What should an EasyGen alternative replace?
EasyGen is more than a text box. Its site highlights creator and topic research, AI-generated LinkedIn posts, a calendar, and publishing. Some competitor lists still say it has no calendar or scheduling. That's out of date for the current product page. But the site also still has older copy about deliberately avoiding automatic posting, so confirm the exact publishing flow in a trial instead of trusting a feature grid.
Before comparing prices, map a normal week. A consultant who has ideas but struggles to phrase them needs a good editor. A marketer writing for four colleagues needs review, ownership, and a shared calendar. A creator posting to LinkedIn and Instagram needs a cross-network queue. Those are different purchases.
Use one real post idea as your test. Draft it in each trial, edit it until it sounds like you, and note the minutes. Then schedule it or send it to a reviewer. The best tool is the one that removes the step you hate most.
EasyGen alternatives at a glance
| Tool | Best fit | Public entry price checked September 2026 | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postomator | Coordinating multiple LinkedIn profiles | $39/month team workspace | Focused on LinkedIn |
| Supergrow | AI writing and repurposing for a creator | $19/month Starter | Advanced analytics and carousels require Pro |
| Taplio | LinkedIn content plus engagement and leads | $39/month Starter; AI writing from $69/month Growth | Starter excludes AI writing |
| MagicPost | LinkedIn publishing and measurement | €29/month Analytics; AI requires another plan | Plan choice needs care |
| AuthoredUp | Hands-on writing and formatting | $19.95/month Individual | Its AI Coauthor is in closed beta |
| Buffer | Simple scheduling across networks | Free; Essentials $6/channel/month | Less focused on LinkedIn writing |
| Kleo | Research, writing, images, video, and multiple networks | $49/month Creator | Credit limits; analytics starts on Business |
Prices use monthly billing where available. Some vendors advertise lower annual equivalents. Compare the bill you'll pay.
1. Postomator: for coordinating several LinkedIn voices
If a company asks a founder, a salesperson, and an engineer to share a launch, pasting one caption into three accounts is a weak result. Each person needs their own angle, and someone needs to know which drafts are ready. Postomator is built around that handoff: one workspace, drafts shaped to each person's role and voice, review, a shared calendar, and publishing to their connected LinkedIn accounts.
The public site lists $39 per month for one team workspace. It also lists AI-assisted editing, repurposing existing material, PDF document posts, and native video scheduling. Each profile owner decides whether authorized workspace members can publish for them. That matters when an employee wants editorial help without handing over their LinkedIn password.
Postomator is a good match when coordination is the problem. It's a poor match if you want to manage Instagram and TikTok alongside LinkedIn. And if you're a solo user who only needs a free queue, Buffer or LinkedIn's native scheduler may be enough.
Start with one brief and three distinct perspectives. If the drafts still sound like the same corporate account, rewrite them before you schedule. Our guide to repurposing content for social media shows how to find fresh angles in material you already have.
2. Supergrow: for a creator who wants AI and a content board
Supergrow's pricing page lists a $19 monthly Starter plan with Content DNA, limited Postcast AI interview sessions, repurposing from articles, YouTube, and PDFs, scheduling, and a calendar. The $39 Pro plan adds unlimited interview sessions, a carousel maker, profile analytics, and weekly reporting.
That makes it a close EasyGen alternative for an individual whose bottleneck is turning a few good ideas into several LinkedIn posts. The Kanban board helps if drafts tend to vanish into docs and chat threads. You'll still need to edit AI output for precise examples and claims. A voice model doesn't know which promises you can back up.
The plan difference is clear-cut. If two interview sessions a month are enough, Starter will do. If interviews are your main source of posts, test Pro. If you're coordinating several executives, compare its Teams plan with a shared workspace product. Don't assume a solo subscription will scale.
3. Taplio: for a full LinkedIn growth workflow
Taplio's 2026 pricing guide lists Starter at $39 a month, Growth at $69, and Pro at $199. Starter covers scheduling and core analytics without AI writing. Growth adds AI drafting, an inspiration library, engagement tools, and collaboration. Pro adds a bigger lead and outreach layer.
Taplio is worth a look if you want ideas, publishing, engagement, analytics, and lead work in one place. For someone who uses every part, that saves a lot of tool switching. It can also mean paying for tools you never open. If you write all your own posts and only need a calendar, compare Starter with Buffer, AuthoredUp, and Postomator before buying the bigger plan.
Run Taplio's trial with a real weekly routine. Make one post from your own notes, queue it, then check the analytics and engagement screens. That tells you more than comparing feature counts.
4. MagicPost: for LinkedIn publishing and measurement
MagicPost splits analytics and creation into separate plans. Its help-center pricing overview lists an Analytics plan at €29 monthly, or €17 monthly billed annually, with scheduling and LinkedIn metrics. The vendor says the in-app billing page is the source of truth for changes. Check its current AI plan there before you subscribe.
That split works well if you write your own posts and want a clearer view of performance. If you're leaving EasyGen because you want AI to write first drafts, make sure the MagicPost plan you pick includes it. A cheap analytics tier isn't a like-for-like replacement for a writing subscription.
5. AuthoredUp: for editing your own posts
AuthoredUp focuses on a LinkedIn writing and formatting workspace: post preview, snippets, drafts, calendar, scheduling, and analytics. Its Individual plan is $19.95 monthly. Its pricing page lists an AI Coauthor as closed beta, so don't buy it assuming every account already has mature AI drafting.
For a strong writer, that can be a plus. If your problem with EasyGen is that drafts sound generic, a better editor may help more than another generator. Write the opening yourself, preview the line breaks and media, then schedule it. Our LinkedIn post formatting guide has a practical checklist.
AuthoredUp also has a Business plan with a three-profile minimum. Compare the per-profile bill with how your team works. A manager reviewing drafts needs something different from an employee posting from their own account.
6. Buffer: for straightforward multi-network scheduling
Buffer's plan documentation makes the trade-off easy to see. Free includes three channels and up to ten scheduled posts per channel. Essentials costs $6 per channel monthly for the first ten channels; Team costs $12 per channel monthly in that range. Buffer also lists an AI Assistant, a calendar, and LinkedIn PDF scheduling.
Buffer is a practical pick when your posts are already written and the problem is remembering to publish them. It also suits a small business that needs one calendar for LinkedIn and other networks. Per-channel pricing grows with every profile or Page you connect, so count your channels before assuming it's the cheapest option.
If you only schedule one LinkedIn profile, try LinkedIn's own scheduling clock first. It's free. Pay for Buffer when a shared queue, cross-network publishing, or its interface saves enough time to matter.
7. Kleo: for a broader content studio
The Kleo pricing page covers research, AI writing, image and video generation, brand materials, and publishing to several networks. Creator costs $49 monthly and includes 1,000 monthly credits. Business costs $99 monthly and adds analytics and a second seat. Older Kleo comparisons describe a single $99 unlimited plan; go by the current billing page.
Kleo suits a creator who wants research, visuals, and writing in one place. It's more than you need if your only task is tightening three LinkedIn posts a week. Test the credit model with your normal mix of writing, images, and video. Track how many credits one finished post uses, not how many rough drafts it can churn out.
How to pick an EasyGen alternative in 30 minutes
- Bring one real source. Use a client question, a newsletter paragraph, a talk transcript, or a draft you're allowed to publish. Skip generic prompts like "write about leadership."
- Write the same post twice. Generate or edit it in two tools with the same source and the same time limit. Count the changes you'd need before publishing it under your name.
- Run the last mile. Preview the post, schedule it, and, if relevant, send it to a colleague for review. Plenty of writing tools look great until this step.
- Check the bill for your real setup. Count profiles, Pages, seats, AI credits, and whether the displayed rate requires annual payment.
- Review the next day. Did the tool make the process faster without making the post less specific? A nicer calendar only helps if you'll come back to it.
For a repeatable weekly process, set up a LinkedIn content calendar with topics and owners before you automate publishing.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a free EasyGen alternative?
Yes. Buffer's free plan supports three channels and ten scheduled posts per channel. LinkedIn also has a native post scheduler. Both handle publishing more than EasyGen-style research and AI drafting. Test a free tool against the specific step you want to replace.
Which alternative is best for AI-written LinkedIn posts?
Supergrow and Taplio Growth are the strongest options to test for AI-assisted LinkedIn writing. Kleo offers a broader AI content studio. Postomator helps teams make role-specific drafts. Feed each one your own notes and judge the edited result, not a demo built on a generic topic.
Does EasyGen schedule posts?
EasyGen's site describes a content calendar and says you can create, schedule, and publish posts from it. The same page also has older wording about avoiding automatic posting. Check the exact behavior in your account before switching only for scheduling.
Is Postomator a good fit for a solo creator?
It can be, if you want its LinkedIn editing and scheduling workflow. But it's built mainly for small teams coordinating several profiles. If you're solo and mainly need a free queue, try Buffer and LinkedIn's native scheduler first.
The practical choice
Pick the tool for the stage where your posts stall. If you need ideas and first drafts, try Supergrow, Taplio Growth, or Kleo. If your writing is good but you need a queue, try Buffer or native scheduling. If your team has drafts in four inboxes and nobody knows who can publish, see how Postomator coordinates a shared LinkedIn week.
Run the same real post through two trials this week. That 30-minute exercise will teach you more than another twenty-column feature grid.